Search for: "STATE v. MEYER" Results 601 - 620 of 1,041
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am by WSLL
Richard Meyer and Robert N. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:33 am by Jon Hyman
” — from Employment Discrimination Report Bad “Business Judgment” is not Discrimination – Veronese v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by John Steele
 At oral argument, the Second Circuit Panel, consisting of Judges Lynch, Walker and Gleeson, appeared to paint the parties into a corner, first eliciting a representation from Jacoby & Meyers that it decided not to challenge the New York statutes out of concern that the district court might abstain from deciding the case (under Railroad Commission v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:39 am by Jon Hyman
Tomorrow, I start my march toward a four-peat, with a post on the Supreme Court’s oral argument in Vance v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 5:41 am
Eric Meyer: Does the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act cover lost LinkedIn business opportunities? [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm by My name
            [1] Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
  The inset photo is of the Jacob Weinberger US Courthouse (story here), home to the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego, where Bankruptcy Judges Adler, Bowie, Mann, Meyers, and Taylor sit. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by David Bernstein
United States (invalidating a law banning employers from prohibiting their employees from joining unions) and Adkins v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:00 pm by David Bernstein
Cushman puts it this way, re Meyer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:09 pm by Cynthia Godsoe
communism, which partially underlies the Supreme Court’s grant of strong individual parental rights in Meyer v. [read post]