Search for: "STATE v. TAYLOR" Results 601 - 620 of 3,329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 10:05 am
Kleffner, A Bird’s-Eye View on Compliance with the Law of Armed Conflict 70 Years After the Adoption of the Geneva Conventions Ioana Cismas & Ezequiel Heffes, Not the Usual Suspects: Religious Leaders as Influencers of International Humanitarian Law Compliance Other ArticlesAniel de Beer & Martha Bradley, Appellate Deference Versus the De Novo Analysis of Evidence: The Decision of the Appeals Chamber in Prosecutor v Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo Kilian Roithmaier, Taylor… [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29, Oct. 9 and Oct. 16 conferences) Taylor v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:03 am by LII Team
Craig presented an overview of the Georgia v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Murphy, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Work of the International Law Commission International DecisionsMaiko Meguro, State of the Netherlands v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 and Oct. 9 conferences) Taylor v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) Taylor v. [read post]