Search for: "STRONG v STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 16,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:44 pm
., to have review granted by the California Supreme Court -- there's a strong tendency to write an expansive missive on the subject. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As explained in Hesham Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] 1 WLR 4799, Parliamentary and public concern about failures to deport large numbers of foreign citizens who had committed serious offences in the UK led to the adoption of the UK Borders Act 2007, which provided that for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s power to deport under the 1971 Act, the deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 5:50 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion in Keith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Last week marked the 10th anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision known as Kelo v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:24 am
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona recently dealt a strong blow to a company for willfully infringing Cricket Communication’s intellectual property rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by José Carlos Laguna de Paz
Americans have been long resistant to strong executive authority. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Virginia was one of several states that enacted a strong eminent domain reform law after the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
Well, maybe wonderful is too strong a word, but definitely good compared to her other swings and misses. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:37 am by Robert Chesney
After months of procedural wrangling, the merits at last have been joined in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
  However, they rejected the defence of fair comment on the basis that it was not comment “on facts truly stated”. [read post]