Search for: "Savage v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
However, in the leading case of Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681l , the House of Lords held that a hospital did have an operational duty to take reasonable steps to protect a mental health patient from suicide where that patient was detained under the MHA. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
Savage of the Los Angeles Times , Carlos Ball in the Huffington Post, Daniel B. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
”  Writing for the Los Angeles Times, David Savage, Carol J. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:23 am by Nabiha Syed
With the Court’s winter recess underway, commentators continue their discussion of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:31 pm
  When Savage filed suit in federal court before dismissing his state-level claims, the university moved for summary judgment on the grounds that Savage had waived all federal and state damages claims against state officials arising from the above-recited facts by bringing an action in the Court of Claims, citing Leaman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
New Hampshire and CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]