Search for: "Seaman v. Seaman"
Results 601 - 620
of 691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
In Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
In Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:37 pm
But in its 2001 decision in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in Stewart v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:43 pm
Related Blog Posts Seaman with Aplastic Anemia Was Entitled to Maintenance and Cure, Contrary to Massachusetts District Court’s Decision: Ramirez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:38 am
” World Fuel Services, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:36 pm
Kwak of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:59 am
Russo v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:37 pm
Williams v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:59 am
ShareOn Monday, the court heard argument in Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged in March about the court’s rejecting the religious accommodation claim in this case, but the court (in Jama v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:22 am
The case I am referring to is the opinion released yesterday by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal: Wallace et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:40 am
This morning's WorkCompCentral story about the recent California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's Significant Panel Decision in Bodam v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:37 pm
The City also cites Wills v Amerada Hess Corp. in support of dismissal. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
That law applies to rail workers; the issue also arises under the Jones Act, for seaman. [read post]
