Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2020, 3:13 pm
McNamara v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 10:19 am
In its 1991 decision in Ylst v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:40 pm
The case, South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
See Hy Cite Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
In Case v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
Mills v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Lord Sumption pointed out that it was not expressly stated in the ADA that the authority to collect payments was irrevocable, nor was it stated that such an authority should survive termination. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:39 am
The case is Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:42 am
In Brantley v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 9:25 am
., v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:45 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 8:33 pm
State v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:50 am
Knox v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:17 am
United States, 296 F.Supp.... [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 4:53 pm
SSP Partners v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm
People v. [read post]
