Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 3,984
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2021, 11:39 am by Kevin LaCroix
The buyer subsequently alleged that the seller had misrepresented its fee structure. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am by John Jascob
Lastly, the court justified its decision from a California Court of Appeals holding in the 1983 Hall v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:03 pm by Shaked Barkay
” In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Where intention is clearly stated or evident, the analytical focus generally turns to whether the inchoate or unresolved aspects of the parties’ agreement are &ld [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm by Shannon O'Hare
Nonetheless, as Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, stated, “the good news is, Congress is not going to be the Grinch”. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
The upshot of the three cases — Centro Empresarial v America Movil, Arfa v Zamir, and Pappas v Tzolis — is that it depends not only on the particular language of the waiver or release but also on the sophistication of the complaining party and whether, at the time of the transaction, the complaining party had reason to distrust the other party such that it could not reasonably rely on the latter’s representations. [read post]