Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
In Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Watkins v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Mary Catholic Parish in Littleton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 8:38 am
Rivers v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:07 am
In his recent decision in the case of Sharp v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
Moreover, he did not believe that the impasse could be overcome through an amendment to the Constitution, for he regarded Article V's supermajority requirements as virtually encoding gridlock into the amendment process. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:23 am
I'm going to do another post shortly about how Bolling v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:33 am
The gravest threat today to public-employee unions—which represent cops, firefighters, prison guards, teachers, nurses, and other city and state workers—is a Supreme Court case named Harris v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
We’re grateful to learn of a legal historians' brief in Comcast Corporation, Petitioner v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:23 am
CASE NAME: Jose Cervantes v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:10 am
In Carter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 11:00 am
In today's Appellate Zealots column in the DJ, Audra Ibarra presents New Trials and Untimely Affidavits, about Kabran v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
The lawsuit, National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
“Annalisa is a sharp, talented attorney and we are happy to have her on board. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Sharp Healthcare, 108 Cal. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am
Eszter SzakácsCo-author: Zsolt Lengyel, Danubia Patent and Law Office Just a few months before the CJEU’s judgment in C-121/17 Teva UK Ltd and Others v Gilead Sciences Inc. came out a the Metropolitan Court of Budapest handed down a decision regarding Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp’s (MSD) application for an SPC re the combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:28 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:24 pm
Earlier this month the closely watched case of U.S. ex rel Drakeford v Tuomey Healthcare System Inc. (675 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 2012) concluded with a jury finding that the compensation paid to physicians under certain part-time employment agreements by Tuomey Healthcare System resulted in violations of both the federal False Claims Act and the federal Stark law. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
Kleindienst v. [read post]
