Search for: "Shields Operating, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 11:55 am by Heather Coffman
  The legislation amends the California Labor Code and Unemployment Insurance Code to confirm the impacts of 2018’s California Supreme Court case Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 12:09 pm by Nicole Moody
Weis Markets, Inc., a Pennsylvania court was not deterred by privacy concerns when it compelled access to social media accounts. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am by Guest Blogger
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently weighed in on the “bodily harm intentionally inflicted” portion of s. 178(1)(a.1)(i) in Dickerson v. 1610396 Ontario Inc. (2013 ONCA 653). [read post]
  Some recent recipients of SAFETY Act protection include: National Football League:  Certification for guidelines for stadium security management to deter and defend against terrorist attacks at sports stadiums; Leidos:  Designation for a non-intrusive inspection system to scan motorized vehicles; Hardwire, LLC:  Designation for a physical shield installed over vulnerable cable bridge components; ASIS International, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
"  He also cites an earlier appellate precedent, Marder's Nurseries, Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[121] But that freedom doesn't protect an organization's right to refuse to allow speakers onto its property:[122] The law schools say that allowing military recruiters equal access impairs their own expression by requiring them to associate with the recruiters, but … a speaker cannot "erect a shield" against laws requiring access "simply by asserting" that mere association "would impair its message. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:57 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Libra also argued that Adam’s amended complaint, viewed as a whole, alleged no more than a mere disagreement over the correct direction of ALP’s business, decisions shielded by the common-law business judgment rule. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., 819 F.2d 875 (9th Cir. 1987) (shunning); Hubbard v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like with prescription drugs, the judicial activists on the Supreme Court have bent over backwards to shield medical device manufacturers from any responsibility for their actions, frequently twisting the words of Congress — sometimes outright inventing Congressional statutes that don’t exist, like in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Barry Sookman
Last year an interlocutory injunction was issued by the Federal Court to enjoin the marketing and sale of ISDs in Bell Canada v. 1326030 Ontario Inc. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Staff
(HMA), and 14 hospitals that Health Management Associates, Inc. owned and operated. [read post]