Search for: "Short v. Downs"
Results 601 - 620
of 8,346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 4:25 am
Moreno v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:23 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am
As for the value of "the patent's inclusion in the standard," it's worth nothing that even Justice Mellor's InterDigital v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
In this post, Karen Denny (Partner) and Zainab Hodgson (Senior Associate) in the Litigation & Arbitration Team at CMS, comment on the highly anticipated judgment in The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) [2023] UKSC 11 – handed down on 15 March 2023. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
In Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
Why, they asked, should unelected Justices be empowered to strike down laws passed by the democratically elected Knesset, which represents the will of the people? [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most recently and notably, in 2020, in Kelly v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 8:50 am
[The Sosa v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
In short, we may be talking about thousands of standards to be reported and checked by the EUIPO. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
," and I wrote up a short (12-page) article for that. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
Art. 2(4): this is all w/o prejudice to rules laiid down by the © laws. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
And decisions in some other jurisdictions could also come down anytime. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:23 pm
The trial court slices that down a ton, to roughly $80,000. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:16 pm
Here it is: Abuse of Discretion: The Trump Indictment Gerard V. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Marcus Smith J disagreed and kept in mind the shortness of the period to trial. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:28 am
Daimler and Nokia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
From C.M. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Then in City of Austin v. [read post]
