Search for: "Simmons v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2008, 10:52 am
Hayden and State v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Simmons) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 07-1315 Case name: Knowles v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by admin
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
It’s time for the sixth volume of Retromark, Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons’ rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Under the terms of the Amendment, each state has a single vote, which is determined by how a majority of that state’s Representatives vote. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Greenhouse writes:It has been nearly three months since the court “invited” — that is to say, ordered — Solicitor General Elena Kagan to “express the views of the United States” on whether laws that take away the right to vote from people in prison or on parole can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act as racially discriminatory.The order came in a case from Massachusetts, Simmons v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:01 pm
Simmons, 2005), the options for using the death penalty continue to narrow. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Erin Miller
Simmons (2005) and Atkins v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
Simmons (2005), a juvenile offender may not be sentenced to die. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:36 am by SHG
In both states, every 17-year-old is tried as an adult. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court's 2002 ruling in Atkins v. [read post]