Search for: "Small v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 16,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2023, 1:13 pm
Currently pending before the United States Supreme Court is the matter of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 12:45 pm
The Biden administration appealed the ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am
Rex Real Estate I, L.P. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
Morgan Reed—president of the APP Association, a global trade association for small and medium-sized technology companies—presented extensively on the subject at the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) COPPA workshop (which is worth reading in full). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
The chain of events leading to the reasonable accommodation denial in Oross v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Hamlet Condominium Ass’n v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
Tiny or frivolous claims are still not likely, given that litigation costs in most Member States are much higher, and litigation over small amounts simply does not pay off for plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm
Darue and Gunn v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
The court became involved following allegations of corruption in the local police force and claims that firearms were stolen from the state arsenal and used to fuel ethnic violence that overtook the small northeast Indian state in early summer. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm
United States, 1958’s NAACP v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 pm
See also Holt v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
See Parts I, II, III, IV, and V. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:47 am
Jones v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
§ 414(v)(7)(B) . [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
