Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 1,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The problem stems from an overbroad and poorly monitored federal regulation, upheld by the US Supreme Court in Thornburgh v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Amy Howe
South Carolina Conference of the NAACP, the justices will consider a challenge to the congressional redistricting map that South Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature enacted after the 2020 census. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm by Brian A. Comer
Adoption of these four exceptions aligns South Carolina with the majority of states that have adopted these same four exceptions. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:49 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-297Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:33 pm by Victoria VanBuren
by Jeremy Clare Even though Lance Armstrong decided on August 23rd not to proceed to arbitration with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”), the process for sanctioning Mr. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:53 pm by Jack Pringle
 I try to view these decisions through the lens of how an attorney practicing in South Carolina might learn from them. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court of South Carolina discussed this fact pattern in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
His work places particular emphasis on Bonham's Case and a series of early South Carolina decisions striking down state laws. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Gregory Forman
Sarah W., a divided South Carolina Supreme Court reinstated a termination of parental rights and rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:37 pm by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Although the Bland decision is “The Law” only in the states under its jurisdiction (North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia), the court’s reasoning is sound and likely to be followed in other jurisdictions. [read post]