Search for: "Southern v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 8,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
Automobile Club of Southern California, case no. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
The latest California Verdict Search (reports available in paper version only) reports a defense verdict in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California (that's San Diego) in a case called Wawanesa General Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the district court granted defendant's motion in limine to exclude plaintiff's damage expert's testimony based on the entire market value rule. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 8:16 pm
Fla. 2020), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida addressed the admissibility of expert testimony in a maritime personal injury lawsuit. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:32 am
Colonial legislation affecting Indigenous peoples of southern New England as organized by state. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:15 am
Southern Ute Indian Tribe (federal contracts) was denied on June 25, 2012.* U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 12:13 pm
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies) United States, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:04 am
Dent v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:52 am
But here, the DEA argues in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Massey in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, case number 3:23-cv-02323-MMA-AHG. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:05 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court held that general-jurisdiction-by-registration statutes do not violate the Due Process Clause. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:12 am
On March 29, 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that claims covering isolated DNA and methods of use for DNA diagnosis are not patentable. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 8:20 am
A. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
Southern Pac. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 5:58 am
The case is styled, Gloria Martinez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:08 pm
In Balderas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:28 am
It is styled, Charles Van Tassel v. [read post]
