Search for: "Spelling v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
In June, the Supreme Court agreed with Lucia that SEC ALJs are inferior officers of the United States and, thus, must be appointed in conformance with the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel, 152 AD2d 893, concerned the issue of an employer’s refusal to permit an employee to withdraw a resignation following its delivery to the appropriate appointing authority.Smith, a permanent state employee with the State Division of Equalization and Assessment, submitted his resignation for “personal reasons. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Department of Justice spells out the duties of the Attorney General: Represent the United States in legal matters. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
The standard form for referring only to an earlier communication can only be used under strict conditions spelled out in the Guidelines. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am
” Additional coverage comes from Ann Marimow and Erin Cox for The Washington Post, who report that “[a]dvocates for redistricting reform in Maryland see Frosh’s appeal as a chance for the Supreme Court to spell out clear rules that would apply to every state in the country. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
The case, United Federation of Churches v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:21 am
As the Supreme Court explained in INS v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
Given the statutory ambiguities, readers may wonder why the Park Service’s reading of ANILCA and its own enabling acts would not be entitled to deference from the Supreme Court under Chevron v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
I'm not sure that I'd want any particular thing to be called the "Martin Effect," but even if it were something bad, hey, as long as they spell your name correctly, right?) [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 12:41 pm
That case, Fitisemanu v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Schrand, 2018-Ohio-3787.Background of Mezher v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Schrand, 2018-Ohio-3787.Background of Mezher v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm
It is our opinion that, based upon his own words during his confirmation process, Justice Kavanaugh will never understand the role of the Supreme Court as spelled out by Justice Brandeis in his 1928 dissenting opinion (one of the most eloquent and most often cited opinions in Supreme Court history) in Olmstead v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:21 am
The arbitrator acknowledged the Seventh Circuit’s rule in Roadmaster Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court on April 17, 2013 issued its opinion in McNeely v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
" And then they quote from a decision the District Court of Massachusetts made in August 2016 in Esoterix v. [read post]
