Search for: "Spencer v Spencer" Results 601 - 620 of 1,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 10:08 am
 The beneficial effect of the findings of the survey would, Zee Entertainment assured the court, easily justify the modest costs involved.Referring to the then-recent outbreak of authoritative case law on survey evidence in Interflora v Marks & Spencer, Birss J refused the application. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Spencer, Seventh Circuit: The Seventh Circuit vacated Appellant's sentence because the district court improperly included a sentencing enhancement. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:22 am by Jeremy
Once upon a time there was the Newspaper Licensing Agency, a relatively stuffy and generally unloved body that was seen by many users of copyright-protected materials as an infernal nuisance and as a meddlesome, bungling litigant, as in the notorious case of Newspaper Licensing Agency Limited v Marks and Spencer Plc, resolved by a powerful speech of Lord Hoffmann in the House of Lords back in 2001 [this case is worth reading for the facts alone: here is a 21st century ruling on use… [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am by Giles Peaker
He did not serve any s.21 Notice (of any sort, vide Spencer v Taylor). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am by Giles Peaker
He did not serve any s.21 Notice (of any sort, vide Spencer v Taylor). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Her insights on these and other matters appear in the Bureau of National Affairs, Spencer Publications, the Wall Street Journal, the Dallas Business Journal, the Houston Business Journal, Modern and many other national and local publications. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:26 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In the Second Circuit's most important Garcetti precedent in this area, Weintraub v. [read post]