Search for: "Stacks v. Stacks" Results 601 - 620 of 2,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
First credit goes to HHJ Purle QC, sitting as a judge of the High Court, who has managed the seemingly impossible task of giving judgment in such a case without reference to any authority (beyond Yeoman's Row v Cobbe, but on the quantum meruit point), despite the case being redolent (at least) of the facts in Lloyds Bank v Rosset, Midland Bank v Cooke, Coombes v Smith, Cobbe (on the estoppel point), Stack v Dowden, Thorner v Major… [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Walter Olson
George Mason lawprof and former Federal Trade Commission commissioner Joshua Wright, who specializes in antitrust, guestblogging at Daniel Fisher’s on FTC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 9:39 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
  The revisions aim at implementing the amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD V) and Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR II) and promoting convergence towards best supervisory practices. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 7:40 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
In a case that pertains to technology originally developed in the 1990s, the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Google LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
At the pleading stage, the court is not “to stack up inferences side by side and allow the case to go forward only if the plaintiff’s inferences seem more compelling than the opposing inferences. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 4:59 am by Roya Ghafele (OxFirst)
Cases such as Conversant vs ZTE/Huawei, Philips vs TCL, TQ Delta v ZyXel or Optis v Apple pertain equally to the licensing of standard essential patents. [read post]