Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2021, 1:42 pm
Governor Newsom this week lauded the Attorney General’s recent success in defending the validity of California’s Housing Accountability Act (the “anti-NIMBY law”) from challenge in California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm
Their brief in opposition was filed in the pending case of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
Saul also discussed the recent California Court of Appeals decision of Taylor v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
See, Reeves v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:01 pm
In Lamden v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:56 am
The lower Court’s ruling is available at courtinfo.ca.gov. 1 Californians for Disability Rights v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
It might be otherwise if we were only dealing with prudential standing. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
In Center for Food Safety, et al, v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:27 am
Thus, for example, the court finds Article III standing for the California publicity rights violation. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 pm
GapLinkedIn Beats Referrer URL Privacy Class Action on Article III Standing Grounds--Low v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
However, California’s numerous private universities and colleges stand to be affected. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:30 pm
Finstuen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
Cayuga Nation (IGRA; Jurisdiction) Stand Up For California! [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
Most recently in Regents of University of California v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Photo from Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).On Monday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:05 pm
During that stay, the mother wanted to board up Linda K. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:00 am
Next up – the hat trick. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
The classic example was Naim v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
Your question alone generates reasonable suspicion up the ying yang. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:22 am
ChernukPlaintiff Wins $7,000 Following Bench Trial on Claims Under California Anti-Spam Statute -- Balsam v. [read post]
