Search for: "Standard Benefit Administrators"
Results 601 - 620
of 12,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 12:05 pm
" What actually happened then was that the governors of all 50 states (the states being contracted by Social Security to do the initial determinations and CDR's) were so appalled by the Reagan Administration's attempt to limit the number of new beneficiaries and squeeze those already receiving benefits that they refused to execute the policies set forth by that Administration. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:05 pm
" What actually happened then was that the governors of all 50 states (the states being contracted by Social Security to do the initial determinations and CDR's) were so appalled by the Reagan Administration's attempt to limit the number of new beneficiaries and squeeze those already receiving benefits that they refused to execute the policies set forth by that Administration. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:50 am
The Disability insurance company (Reliance Standard) had initially approved and paid benefits for more than a year. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:12 pm
Safety & Security Standards. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:45 pm
With these orders, UK employees will now have a remedy and won’t be denied a judicial review because of sovereign immunity: UK employees can seek judicial review of UK’s administrative decision under an arbitrary and capricious standard. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:45 pm
With these orders, UK employees will now have a remedy and won’t be denied a judicial review because of sovereign immunity: UK employees can seek judicial review of UK’s administrative decision under an arbitrary and capricious standard. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 10:36 am
Glenn, the Court ruled that the fact that a claim administrator of an ERISA plan also funds the plan benefits is a "conflict of interest" that must be weighed in a judicial review of the administrator's benefit determination. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:14 am
Filed under: Affordable Care Act, Claims Administration, Corporate Compliance, Employers, ERISA, Excise Tax, Fiduciary Responsibility, Health Plans, Human Resources, Income Tax, Patient Empowerment, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Payroll Tax, Preemption, Privacy, Reporting & Disclosure, Tax, Wellness Tagged: compliance, Employee Benefits, Employer, Finance, Health Benefits, Health Care Reform, Health Care Reform. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 9:15 am
It also reaffirmed that executive agencies should conduct a cost-benefit analysis of regulations. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 10:38 am
It also reaffirmed that executive agencies should conduct a cost-benefit analysis of regulations. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 9:15 am
It also reaffirmed that executive agencies should conduct a cost-benefit analysis of regulations. [read post]
21 May 2021, 10:22 am
With a new administration comes new standards, and the Department of Labor – now under President Biden – recently announced that rule is being withdrawn in order to protect employees and give them the benefits they are entitled to. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 11:39 am
Further controlled studies are required to prove that intranasal breast milk administration benefits infants with brain injuries. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA), now the dominant policy-evaluation tool, is insensitive to distributive impacts—at least in its standard form. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:01 pm
History of the Controversy The controversy started back in April 2008, when then-Governor Janet Napolitano (now secretary of homeland security in Washington, D.C.) approved a change to the Arizona Administrative Code that expanded the definition of “dependents” of state employees eligible for benefits to include domestic partners of either sex. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 2:33 pm
President Donald Trump’s March 6threvised Executive Order directs the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence to review information sharing and develop uniform screening and vetting standards and procedures for visas and other immigration benefits. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:08 am
The lower courts have created a wide range of rules as to how, and when, such a conflict can alter the standard of review that a district court is to apply when passing on a benefit determination made by such an administrator. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:00 am
Applying this standard to the administrative judge’s order, the court found that the second decision had simply “rectified” the earlier decision. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:10 am
” Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) asked about science standards and if Shelanski would ensure that the agencies enforce minimum standards, such as peer review, when using science to inform the rulemaking process. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
Well, off-label use, as such, sure isn’t any sort of violation of the standard of care. [read post]
