Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,010
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 4:00 pm
Superior Court of California, 137 S. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:05 am
Superior Court, No. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 135 Cal.App.4th 263, 285-86 (1999)). [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
In a published opinion filed March 24, 2020, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Division One) reversed a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, entered by the San Diego County Superior Court after sustaining a demurrer without leave on statute of limitations grounds to a group’s action challenging the CEQA review for Caltrans’ Interstate 5 (I-5)/State Route 56 (SR 56) freeway interchange project (the “Project”). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:27 pm
Superior Court, applied in the nationwide class action context. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
Within Alphonse v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Superior Court (Rackauckas), no. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
United States 19-1026Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 2:13 pm
See Iskanian v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 7:30 am
Lyft, Inc., were filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 2:33 pm
Superior Court of California, 137 S. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am
Superior Court of California, 137 S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:31 am
They may also result in complaints to the State Dental Board. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
Yelp The California Supreme Court Didn’t Ruin Section 230 (Today)–Hassell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 2:31 pm
Per Elections Code section 1100, elections may not be held the day after a state holiday.Attorney (Holiday)Brown ActAppeal from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County.Atwell Island Water District (AIWD) is a California water district located in Tulare County, California, and is governed by a five-member board of directors. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
It would also adopt certain aspects of the California state court decision of Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:36 am
The court says Yelp’s website constitutes a public forum (but only in the anti-SLAPP sense, not the state action sense, a point made in the uncited Prager U v. [read post]
