Search for: "State Court District 1" Results 601 - 620 of 48,622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2022, 12:25 pm by Amy Howe
ShareTelling the Supreme Court that Texas officials “are not entitled to a second bite at the apple,” a group of abortion providers asked the justices to order a federal court of appeals to send their challenge to Texas’s restrictive anti-abortion law promptly back to the friendlier confines of a federal district court in that state. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:48 pm by Stan Gibson
The district court stated that “a]lthough a close call, the Court finds that there is good cause to extend the fact discovery deadline for the limited purpose of allowing PMC’s expert to review the source code for preparation of his report. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
Although Flo & Eddie have prevailed in the trial courts in the Southern District of New York and Central District of California on nearly identical claims, the court found that “Florida is different” because, unlike California and New York, the state has no statutory or decisional law recognizing public performance rights in pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
Although Flo & Eddie have prevailed in the trial courts in the Southern District of New York and Central District of California on nearly identical claims, the court found that “Florida is different” because, unlike California and New York, the state has no statutory or decisional law recognizing public performance rights in pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
Which gets called out by Chief Judge Kozinski for (1) doing a bad job, and then (2) trying to get out the consequences of this (alleged) malfeasance by convincing -- successfully, I might add -- three district court judges down here (Judges Burns, Benitez, and Collins) to refuse to accept the unconditional guilty pleas of various criminal defendants.No dice, he holds. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:39 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
The District Court for the Southern District of Indiana published an order on November 18, 2020 remanding the Class Action lawsuit against Netflix, Disney, Hulu, DirectTV and Dish to Marion County Superior Court. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:15 pm by Curtis Dodd
District Court Judge Rodney Gilstrap granting a preliminary injunction: (1) enjoining Samsung from taking any action in China that would... [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:31 pm
Also, defendant repeatedly denied living there on the record, so he likely lacked standing, but the district court did not rule on standing, so the appellant court won’t either. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:16 am by DaveKelly
”     This somewhat surprised me because last week I received the following email from the clerk of federal court’s office in Minneapolis: "JUDICIARY TO REMAIN OPEN IF GOVERNMENT SHUTS DOWN In the event there is a government shutdown beginning October 1, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota will continue normal operations Tuesday, October 1, 2013. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm by Matt C. Bailey
On October 24, 2011, the Second District (Division 1) upheld a trial court order denying a motion to compel arbitration of a class action case, post Concepcion, in Sanchez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
District of Columbia As of January 1, 2022, Washington, D.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 12:06 pm by Jeff Welty
The case eventually reached the state supreme court, which ruled: (1) There was insufficient evidence to support the accessory after the fact conviction. [read post]