Search for: "State Road Department v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 1:12 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Florida, Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court's June 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
Anne Acosta the Respondent was citizen of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:40 pm
" United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Although a demand for retroactivity of wages and benefits is generally a mandatory subject of negotiations under the Act and arbitrable under §204.9(g) of the Act, the Association asserted that the joint employer’s proposal was prohibited based upon the rationale in the Appellate Division, Third Department’s decision in Baker v Board of Education, Hoosick Falls Central School District, 3 AD3d 678, 37 PERB ¶7502 (3d Dept 2004). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:05 am
Rancho Ballena Road is part of a parcel which was conveyed to the Tribe in 1998 (AA p. 027-030) and, in 2002, accepted by the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, in trust for the benefit of the Tribe. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:00 am
Before beginning her Fellowship, she served as law clerk to the Honorable Joel Schneider, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:08 am
United States, 293 F 1013 (D.C. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:54 pm
United States Department of the Interior (official tribal government) * State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Paula E. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:40 pm
” The case is United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services & Kathleen Sebelius, here. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
In response to the decision, NCDOT Secretary Gene Conti released this statement: “We have received the opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on the Monroe Bypass case. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 pm
United States) which held that Commerce's CVD/NME methodology violated US law. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:31 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:12 pm
This may have been the case in United States v. [read post]
