Search for: "State of California v. Superior Court"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:25 am
Superior Court (2018). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
California and non-California plaintiffs filed eight separate state court complaints alleging personal injuries due to use of Plavix. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
California and non-California plaintiffs filed eight separate state court complaints alleging personal injuries due to use of Plavix. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:21 am
Superior Court and Rose v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
CGC-15-544813, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:59 am
Superior Court. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
Yesterday, a California superior court judge dismissed pimping charge (due to Section 230) but did not dismiss money laundering charges against three Backpage executives. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:46 pm
As recently as 2008, California 4th District Court of Appeals addressed this specific issue in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:52 pm
As recently as 2008, California 4th District Court of Appeals addressed this specific issue in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102(1987)). [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 7:14 pm
The California Supreme Court took this issue up in Adolph v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court decision Serrano v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:25 am
Curiously, the Court takes on a ruling in 2008 by another panel of the Superior Court in Billhime v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
Superior Court of L.a. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
Largent Today a California court issued the first published state court decision addressing whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v Concepcion invalidates the California Supreme Court's decision in Gentry v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
The Superior Court sided with the city, and when Pack appealed, the California Court of Appeal ruled that the local ordinance was preempted by federal law, namely the Controlled Substances Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
Superior Court.2. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Heckman issued a tentative decision on November 2, 2020 following a court trial in Gallagher et al. v. [read post]
