Search for: "State of Maryland v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2014, 7:53 pm
Note: Qatar Airways successfully used a similar subject matter jurisdiction argument in a Maryland case (Alemi v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:08 pm
Watts Holding: Docket entries not otherwise subject to shielding that are unclear, ambiguous, or unavailable to the public via the Judiciary’s online case search fail to satisfy the requirements of Maryland Rule 2-601(b)(3) and do not trigger the 8-202(a) thirty-day appeal period.Recordation and indexing of a federal judgment creates a lien, not a new judgment.Facts: In 2002, Petitioner (“Lender”) obtained a default judgment in the United… [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:28 am
In support of this claim, the state relies on United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
The opinion, United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
Newell, et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:50 am
Supreme Court made a very important ruling in 1968 called Terry v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:52 am
The trial court's ruling was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
Florida United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Kidane in order to protect the safety and wellbeing of his family both in the United States and in Ethiopia. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:17 am
Case citation: Trump v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:31 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
United States, Linda C. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 6:54 am
" United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
Department of Homeland Security, et al . , Case No. 8:19-cv-01944-SAG, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
§ 2611(4)(A).There is no directly applicable case law from either the Supreme Court or the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on the issue presented herein. [read post]
