Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The judge stated that “it is quite plain in my view that it is a “lifestyle” interview” and accepted that he had “no authority in that capacity to make statements”. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:20 am
This is not as clear as that, however, as in Maslyukov v Diageo Distilling Limited Justice Arnold saw that "...the test is whether the relevant business has been abandoned so as to destroy the goodwill. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 2:22 pm
The case in Pennsylvania is known as A.S. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
This was just one of the many questions dealt with by Mr Justice Arnold in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:37 am
Ronald Dean Arnold Malvitz challenged the language of the Vehicle Code in the 1992 case of People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
As you would expect if you read the title or had analyzed the trends of when we post about food cases, Arnold v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
The Art of the Family Law and Divorce Objections: Evidence and Procedure in California Family Law Proceedings and RFO Requests By: Michael C. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Some grand IP ideas popped up in Neil's mind, after General Electric company to move its headquarters from the New York suburbs in Fairfield, Connecticut to Boston, in the near-by state of Massachusetts. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:37 am
Tammy Adkins & Helen Arnold of McGuireWoods’s Chicago office wrote up an excellent summary, which I’m quoting below: On January 20th, 2016, in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
It was most likely some classic tort or contract case (see Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Bomb or Caparo v Dickman). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
” Similarly, in Arnold v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court’s reluctance last year to interfere with parties’ freedom of contract is also apparent in the contractual interpretation case of Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36 (Case Comment here). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
This is assuming that the mark’s distinctiveness is a live issue, and bearing in mind that the court’s consideration of this issue might depend on the particular s 3(1)/7(1) subsection it deems to be enlivened.In Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch) at [40]-[45],Arnold J outlined the general principles involved in assessing distinctiveness, stressing the broad nature of this inquiry. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm
Comment The UT here seems to have reached a resolution – at least for itself – of Sella, Assethold, Francis and Arnold v Britton. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
AMORPHOUS https://t.co/S8NVGY0uEG -> Meaning of RMI in DMCA reviewed in TOMELLERI v ZAZZLE https://t.co/Kk5HQJReIV -> Personal jurisdiction founded on selling server loaded with Iinfringing software to State EPIC TECH v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Just think of the forthcoming Batman v Superman ... [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Arnold B. [read post]
