Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 601 - 620
of 701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am
The most recent judgment on the issue was the case of Frodl v Austria (Application no. 20201/04, 8 April 2010 – see our post on that case). [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
Prisoners (as in Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 913),conscripts (Álvarez Ramón v Spain (application no 51192/99) 3 July 2001) and mental patients (Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437) are in a different position because the deprivation of liberty imparts more responsibility on the authorities concerned to ensure that any consequent suicidal ideation is properly dealt with. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Exchange Comm. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm
Frodl v Austria (Application no. 20201/04) 8 April 2010 – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has taken another opportunity to criticise a European state for not allowing a prisoner, in this case convicted of murder, to vote. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
Blackmun and Antonin Scalia did in their dueling separate opinions in a 1992 abortion case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:19 am
United States Bank Nat. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:45 pm
Austria, 28 August 1992, § 32, Series A no. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:32 am
In a decision this week,Decker v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
On this basis the Court concluded that the Schauzu publication discloses olanzapine as one of its compounds.In its assessment, the Court took into account the EPO case law on flaws and mistakes in disclosures (T 89/87, T 412/91, T77/87, T 591/90).The Court also admitted that its decision deviated from earlier decisions in the United States, China, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, United Kingdom, Austria and Spain, giving a brief explanation of… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Inc. et al.; Colorquick, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
The landmark Supreme Court judgment in Republic of Austria v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:46 pm
In its judgment in Case C-135/08 Janko Rottmann v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:19 am
Many of Fritz's artworks are in the Leopold Museum and the Albertina Museum in Austria. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
By Tobias Thienel Last Thursday, the European Court of Human Rights heard oral argument in the case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria. [read post]
