Search for: "State v. Aver" Results 601 - 620 of 947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2011, 3:17 am by Adam Wagner
…… it is difficult to see how a person could reasonably have believed in consent if the complaint alleges a state of sleep or half sleep, and secondly it avers that consent would not have been given without a condom. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts Last week, California-based burger chain In-N-Out sued Denver-based Smashburger, alleging infringement and dilution of trademarks including DOUBLE-DOUBLE and TRIPLE TRIPLE (for, among other things, “hamburger sandwiches and cheeseburger sandwiches”). [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 9:17 am by Rick St. Hilaire
[Sidebar: Alshdaifat, owner of Holyland Numismatics, pleaded guilty on December 21, 2012 to a reduced charge of misdemeanor accessory after the fact in the cultural property case of U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
 Unfortunately 2022 started with some bad news 👎 for insureds and their liability insurers that are or will be facing lawsuits in New York state courts.Heretofore in New York state court practice, discovery proceeded via demands and responses. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am by The Charge
  A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable            In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
Further, reliance is placed on the UK Supreme Court judgment Uber BV vs Aslam, which stated that Uber must pay its drivers national living wage and 28 days paid holidays, from the time that drivers log onto the Uber app, and are willing and able to work. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Minora, issued one of the latest bad faith decisions in the automobile insurance context in the Lackawanna County case of Struble v. [read post]