Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 601 - 620
of 21,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:59 am
His decision on circuit in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In 1777, Iredell drafted a bill establishing the state’s new court system, including a legislatively elected three-judge Superior Court to serve as the state’s high court. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2023-2024update.html One motion for leave to file a bill of complaint was filed on 7/26/2023: Alaska v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
That is, the court held that where the legislature granted wide discretion to the agency, such as to “have regard to” stated factors in taking a decision, a court should go no further than ensuring that the agency, in fact, has taken account of the stated factors and “struck a reasonable equilibrium between them”. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:10 pm
The bill is widely supported by whistleblower advocates. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
In effect, Senate Bill 699 makes California a safe haven for employees seeking relief from a noncompete that would otherwise be enforceable in a different state. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
Doe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Parliament has passed the Online Safety Bill, which will become law as soon as it receives Royal Assent. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
Art Law cases handled as an Assistant United States Attorney: United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm
United States (which I discussed here), the Supreme Court yesterday decided to hear another Takings Clause case: Sheetz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:26 pm
“incur obligations”) consistent with the amounts and restrictions Congress has provided in annual appropriations and authorization bills for those appropriations. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
Hamm v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm
In Devillier v. [read post]
