Search for: "State v. Bolds" Results 601 - 620 of 1,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am by Randy Barnett
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
That v-Lex and Fastcase have merged, now called v-Lex Group, is an important and certainly interesting development for customers on both sides of the Atlantic and far beyond, continuing a process in which the two businesses have been steadily advancing through acquisition and consolidation. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
Member States may however allow a work to be used, without its author’s consent, for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm by Lovechilde
"Before I was elected vice-president, before I was elected United States senator, I was elected attorney general of the state of California, and I was a courtroom prosecutor before then. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
Similarly on January 16, 2007, Morningstarandrsquo;s Andrew Gunter reported that the andquot;Oppenheimer Rochester National Muniand#39;s bold strategy isnand#39;t for the faint of heart. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]