Search for: "State v. Brady" Results 601 - 620 of 1,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2023, 8:13 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Briggs, 48 M.J. 143, 144 (C.A.A.F. 1999); and Brady v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action alleging defamation failed because the challenged statements were absolutely privileged as a matter of law and cannot be the basis for a defamation action (see Ifantides v Wisniewski, 181 AD3d at 576; Weinstock v Sanders, 144 AD3d at 1021; Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d at 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734 [2014]; Rabiea v Stein, 69 AD3d at 701). [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
Nevertheless, if the prosecutor knows that any witnesses have exculpatory information,  the prosecutor must disclose the witnesses' identifying information under Brady v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:15 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th also found violations of Brady by the state as to the plea deal with the informant, and these were not harmless. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm by Steve Hall
  As Justice Calogero notes in his OpEd, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
Gomez and determined the issue was more properly one of due process to be decided under Brady v. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:49 pm by Christian Lautenschleger
Federal law states that simple drug possession is a misdemeanor that can get first-time offenders up to a year in prison. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:53 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
To determine if the state failed to comply with Brady, the Court of Appeals applied the three-prong test developed under Brady v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:57 am by Daniel Schwartz
” So why is the result of today’s Connecticut Supreme Court decision (in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Currently Rule 16 does not require the government to turn over all exculpatory evidence but the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:20 am
Commissioner of Correction ("On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal and improperly concluded that (1) trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to call certain witnesses to testify at the petitioner’s criminal trial, (2) trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to offer a specific recommendation that the petitioner accept the state’s plea offer and (3) the doctrine of res judicata… [read post]