Search for: "State v. Carr" Results 601 - 620 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts Judgment in the case of Carr v Penman [2013] EWHC 2679 (QB) was handed down by Dingemans J on 2 September 2013 (after a hearing on 31 July 2013). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
Apparently Carr is having the last laugh having reduced his tax exposure to 1% with the K2 scheme. [read post]
 Shortly after Chairwoman Rosenworcel’s statement, Commissioner Brendan Carr issued a statement indicating that there is disagreement within the Commission concerning the appropriateness of FCC intervention on this topic. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
Carr that articulated an equal protection violation by the system o [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am by James Innocent
My colleague Jeffrey Carr addressed Goodyear’s transgressions in the case of Haeger v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:02 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: Cover of Jean Dujardin "The Artist's Jean Dujardin apologises for using French swear word during acceptance speech" pjblack.me/A6rLRf high court to hand down its decision in wotton v qld on prisoners' rights & civil & political freedoms tomorrow pjblack.me/xXOfny #lwb242 lol oops: "Facebook made this guy a spokesperson for personal lubricant" pjblack.me/xOft4x … [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:32 am by Hollis Kelly
Tugushev v (1) Orlov, (2) Roth, (3) Petric [2019] EWHC 645 (Comm) is a case which forms part of a bitter and high-profile battle between two Russian businessmen, the Claimant, Alexander Tugushev, and the First Defendant, Vitaly Orlov, alongside two of Mr Orlov’s associates, in relation to the Norebo Group, which is a corporate group which operates an international fishing business largely under Russian state fishing quotas. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]