Search for: "State v. Comes"
Results 601 - 620
of 48,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:54 am
In Bush v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:47 pm
This comes from a Jepsen press release: HARTFORD – George Jepsen, Democratic candidate for Attorney General, said he is confident the state election for attorney general will move forward as scheduled Nov. 2 with his name firmly on the ballot, despite the “desperate” lawsuit filed by his Republican opponent Martha Dean. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:28 am
Two witnesses who knew Jimmy Fennell, the victim Stacey Stites’s fiancé, at the time of the murder have come forward with information which both supports the already substantial evidence of Reed’s innocence and establishes a violation of Due Process under Brady v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:04 pm
While United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 11:02 am
The Supreme Court is to hear oral arguments in KSR v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 3:05 am
Today's immigration article of the day comes from Raquel Muñiz (BC), Maria Lewis (Penn State), Grace Cavanaugh & Melissa Woolsey. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
With these landmark rulings still to come, it would be easy to lose sight of today’s ruling in Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:31 am
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:03 pm
In denying the request, the court stated that it would give the instruction at the conclusion of the case, if requested to do so, and we conclude that "the court's decision to wait until after summations to deliver the instruction was not erroneous" (People v Rescigno, 152 AD2d 853, 854, lv denied 74 NY2d 851; see also People v La Mountain, 155 AD2d 717, 720, lv denied 75 NY2d 814; cf. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:21 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:58 am
, I will appear for my 2nd State Bar of Texas sponsored webcast tomorrow afternoon entitled: Proving/Defending a Discrimination Case: Retaliation and the New Landscape after White v Burlington Northern. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:31 am
ShareTuesday’s argument in McElrath v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The outcome in Trump v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
If so, one big question that comes up is how much time the federal government and the states are likely to be given to deal with the ruling before it takes effect. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
The Courts that have upheld warrantless GPS searches have cited the 1983 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
In his post-arrest interview, he telephoned and arranged for Massey to drive down from Delaware and come to the room to deliver crack cocaine. [read post]
