Search for: "State v. Doom"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 4:07 pm
That concern came fully into the open on Monday as the Court held a seventy-minute hearing on the case of Wittman v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
(R. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
Recently, the Franchise Law Committee of the Business Law Section of the California State Bar issued this e-Bulletin discussing the Court of Appeal’s recent opinion in Verdugo v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
But of course AC then predictably goes on to predict gloom and doom in any event:The Board estimated, for example, that schools covered under the tariff copied approximately 195-million pages from books in Access Copyright’s repertoire each year. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
The case that led to this ruling was Quigg v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 8:55 am
Karasik In EEOC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:15 am
Hail claims lawyers need to read the Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, JAW The Point, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm
In the closing days of its January term, a sharply divided Illinois Supreme Court abolished the public duty rule in Coleman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
For the Symposium on the Constitution and Economic InequalityCynthia EstlundJoseph Fishkin and William Forbath, in their book-in-progress, have brilliantly exposed and mined a once-powerful, mostly-forgotten vein of constitutional political economic thought: the notion that widely shared economic opportunity, and a broad middle class flanked by neither an underclass nor an oligarchic overclass, are essential foundations of our republican form of government. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am
You may remember Ascentive v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
The decision in Montgomery v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:34 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted (Partin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 2:22 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Much about Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:25 am
Synygy, Inc. v. [read post]
