Search for: "State v. Fees"
Results 601 - 620
of 20,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 11:55 am
Department of Justice and eight states brought an antitrust case against Google LLC in the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:07 pm
” They told him the fee was double, and when he declined, the “bouncer” insisted on an “appearance fee”. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:32 am
In Pliego v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:26 pm
§607-14 and stated that case law, the broad language of Haw. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:07 am
., SR. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
Ct., filed 12/20/2010), argues that the city's Transportation Utility Fee is in reality a property tax levied on churches that are exempt under state law from property taxation. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:51 am
In Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:36 am
In Edelman v Poster ; 2010 NY Slip Op 00788 ; Decided on February 4, 2010 ; Appellate Division, First Department we see a situation in which a matrimonial retainer agreement boldly stated a right to arbitrate, yet the Appellate Division, First Department, determined that client has no right to arbitrate. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:40 am
Co-author Chance Decker BNSF v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:40 am
Co-author Chance Decker BNSF v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 10:06 pm
China Grove 152, LLC v Town of China Grove, 773 S.E. 2d 566 (NC App. 7/7/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nc-court-of-appeals/1707053.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Impact Fees Tagged: adequate public facilities ordinance, impact fee [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:15 am
The Colorado federal district court hearing NAIB, et al v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 7:00 am
" Get the whole opinion, McNiff v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
If you want (or need) a roadmap, and powerful quotes by the Ninth Circuit, to help you avoid getting your requested fee award slashed by the district court, here it is.You're welcome. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
Justice Blackmun held for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:43 pm
Bank, N.A. were based on the banks’ assessment of dormancy fees, the claims were federally preempted, the federal district court in Camden ruled.The court relied on SPGGC, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 6:19 am
Supreme Court in Auer v Robbins. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
Linn, specifically stated that parties can’t recover appellate attorneys’ fees in paternity cases, but she argued that the 1999 case was wrongly decided and that the court should award her fees in spite of that ruling. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:50 am
Casamento v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:18 pm
In the recent decision of U.S. v. [read post]
