Search for: "State v. Fisher"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2006, 5:59 am
In its decision today in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:31 am
" The tax court's jurisdiction is limited by state law and higher court rulings to cases arising from decisions of the Indiana Department of State Revenue and the Indiana Board of Tax Review, Fisher wrote. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
Fisher distinguished the Supreme Court’s precedent, for example, Jeffers v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:14 pm
In Cedar Lake Conference Association v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:47 am
See Fisher v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 8:38 am
State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
State Farm v Fisher State_Farm_v_Thomas Stevens v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:14 am
Boyd Street Distro, LLC, May 19, 2022, Fisher, M.). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:13 pm
Henry v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am
Yesterday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:46 am
Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:06 am
At Forbes, Daniel Fisher discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Bond v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Director Lynn Boswell, a broadcast journalist who also holds a law degree, has updated her documentary since it originally aired in 2013 with developments from the closely-watched Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Calendar Date:April 25, 2024Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Aarons, Fisher, McShan and Mackey, JJ. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Calendar Date:April 25, 2024Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Aarons, Fisher, McShan and Mackey, JJ. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm
At one point in Fisher’s argument, Justice Samuel Alito intervened to ensure that Fisher was not asking the court to overrule Chevron, prompting Fisher to state emphatically “no, no, no. [read post]
