Search for: "State v. Freeze" Results 601 - 620 of 1,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Mayela Celis
The latter provision states that jurisdiction over parental responsibility issues should be transferred to the courts where the child has acquired a new habitual residence and one of the alternative conditions set out in the said provision is satisfied (SS v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
Earlier: Vinson & Elkins Raises & Bonuses: New York Happy, Texas Sad Vinson & Elkins - New York - United States - Law - Houston [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:30 am by Daniel Sokol
The judge was also unimpressed by the appellants’ evidence, stating that David Gale and Teresa had lied repeatedly to the court. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:48 am by Jeff Welty
The News and Observer reports here that “[a] Superior Court judge has agreed that dozens of North Carolina magistrates can move forward with a class-action lawsuit that contends a state pay freeze since 2009 constitutes a contractual breach. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm by Amy Howe
The headliner in the October calendar is the litigation over Trump’s March 6 executive order, which put a freeze on both new visas for travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries (Iran, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen) and the admission of refugees into the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 4:22 am
The Court held that the Council is not entitled to base its funds-freezing decision on information or material in the file communicated by a member State, if that member State is not willing to authorize its communication to the EC courts whose task is to review the lawfulness of that decision. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
  However, in the recent case of Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No.2) ([2010] UKSC 26) the Court reached the opposite conclusion, upholding an order which had been made at the outset of the hearing. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 5:59 pm by Amy Howe
The district court temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the two requirements, agreeing with Planned Parenthood that both requirements bore a close resemblance to the Texas rules that the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional in 2016, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]