Search for: "State v. Gamble" Results 601 - 620 of 1,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2017, 7:25 am by Ilya Somin
(Kathy Willens/AP) During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Christie v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
It repealed state regulations on gambling to make it “a purely private matter. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:12 am by Robert Laplaca
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case Christie v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:45 am by NCC Staff
In a double-header that will attach the interest of many court watchers, the nine Justices will tackle a case nominally about football and sports gambling: Christie v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses last week’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:16 am by Amy Howe
” And here, the leagues conclude, the 3rd Circuit was correct that, “whatever else PASPA may prohibit or permit, it does not allow a state to use wordplay to channel sports gambling to its favored venues for state-authorized gambling while prohibiting it everywhere else. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:17 am by Nate Nead
V&S sales, a trend that is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Legal Beagle
How Scottish Borders Council (SBC) gambled with at least £2.4 million of taxpayers’ money, lost it, wrote it off, then mounted a concerted campaign to conceal hundreds of documents, emails and letters linked to the financially disastrous episode from public scrutiny.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYNOTE: The vast majority of this information has been assembled in the course of a two and a half year investigation which SBC has consistently tried to frustrate and hamper.From 2008 onwards Scottish… [read post]
The question was whether Mr Ivey had “cheated” within the meaning of section 42 of The Gambling Act 2005 (which creates a criminal offence of cheating). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 1093 This case considered whether an implied term not to cheat in a gambling contract is only breached where there is dishonesty. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
In the United States such punishments have slowly reached higher level management as well. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
But years later, Marshall made his thoughts clear about the treaty clause in an 1823 decision called American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm by Amy Howe
United States Monday, December 4 Christie v. [read post]