Search for: "State v. Grounds" Results 601 - 620 of 40,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 10:43 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Constitutional Law Tenth Amendment; standing A criminal defendant has standing to challenge a federal statute on grounds that the measure interferes with the powers reserved to States. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 pm
” The caption identifies State Farm and Does 1 to 20 as defendants . . . .State Farm filed a general and special demurrer on the grounds that Eghtesad failed to plead sufficient facts to state causes of action for fraud, defamation, and breach of contract, and that each of the claims was uncertain. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Phelps: No decision of [the Supreme] Court has ever exempted a non-media defendant from generally applicable state tort law on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
United States, the Ninth Circuit had held that the federal government’s transfer of title of Oak Flats, sacred ground to the Apache tribe, did not violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am by Wells Bennett
The United States has filed its appellate brief in the case of Al-Janko v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:28 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit, in a split decision, affirmed denial of motions to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds and Federal Court joinder rules in University of Utah v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:23 pm by Jane Chong
Circuit’s June 10, 2014 decision affirming the ruling below on the grounds that the case raises two questions of exceptional importance: as to (1) whether detainees are “persons” under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act  in the wake of Burwell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:16 pm
In response to the amicus briefs in favor of incorporation (that is, in favor of Gura’s client) but on narrower grounds, Gura states: Nobody has a legitimate reason to fear a faithful interpretation of the Constitution, and nobody has any legitimate reason to fear effective and complete protection of civil rights. [read post]