Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
In Hamilton v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
" (citation omitted)];Matter of Kittredge v Planning Bd. of Town of Liberty, 57 AD3d 1336, 1339 [2008] ["In construing a statute, a court must attempt to harmonize all its provisions and to give meaning to all its parts, considered as a whole, in accord with legislative intent. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
There was never any claim that the legislature’s enactment conflicted with, or needed to be harmonized with, the state constitution. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
Accordingly, [the OHIM was right] in finding [here] that the national law applicable under Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 would be considered in the same manner as a factual issue and that it was not in a position to automatically determine, with precision, the law of all of the Member States concerning the rights within the scope of Article 8(4) [Do: ask the EU to harmonize the national laws which protect signs used in the course of trade; Don't: expect OHIM to… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
” In the case of Jones v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
EU-Member state issues: need to ask new questions—is a regulation v a directive conclusive? [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
" the Court note[d] that, with regard to the nature and extent of the protection which Member States may recognize broadcasting organizations, the Directive does not harmonize any differences between national laws, so it does not preclude more protective provisions. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Marlon Dean Harmon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:12 pm
Both the First District and Fourth District decisions are correct and readily harmonized with one another, despite the recent opinion’s unnecessarily antagonistic tone. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Gonzalez-Perez, V. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
According to reports, the jury award ranks as the third largest ever in a patent case beating out the Apple v Samsung jury award last summer (see this post by Merpel as reproduced in LegalWeek). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:35 am
United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Charles Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
The first was to harmonize risk assessment so that risk could be better embedded in the valuation of economic activity, and more particularly investment decisions by individuals and financial institutions. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 1:22 pm
In Saskatchewan Power Corp. v. [read post]
