Search for: "State v. Her"
Results 601 - 620
of 64,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2020, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am
In Patel it was argued that the Secretary of State’s failure to make a removal decision at the same time, or shortly after, her decision to refuse the appellant leave to remain was unlawful. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am
In Patel it was argued that the Secretary of State’s failure to make a removal decision at the same time, or shortly after, her decision to refuse the appellant leave to remain was unlawful. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Belinda Montoya plead guilty to possession of cocaine and was sentenced to fourteen months in a state jail facility. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:22 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 1:52 am
Hendron v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
The State argued for dismissal of her claims on the basis of workers' compensation exclusivity. [read post]
Weidner v. Karlin, 932 N.E.2d 602 (Ill. App. 2010): Plaintiff's Fraud Claim Against Lawyer Dismissed
5 Oct 2010, 8:53 pm
In Weidner v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:17 am
Arthur-Price v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:33 pm
The post Salinas v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 9:28 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Under the principle in Lumba (Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 it was held that permitting her judicial review claim to proceed would result in a £1 award for damages because she had already been released from detention when it was issued “and it could bring her no practical benefit. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm
On July 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
