Search for: "State v. Levy"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
See Kashelkar v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
The Court referred to the 2006 decision of Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:51 pm
Nonetheless, the court opined that the argument did not withstand the foregoing logic and the express language of Maryland Rule 2-643 (c) which states, “Upon motion of the judgment debtor, the court may release some or all of the property from a levy if it finds that (1) the judgment has been vacated. . . . [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand, supra, 6 Cal.3d at p. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 11:31 pm
• Winter v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
” The Ninth Circuit held that both eBay’s and the District Court’s reading of its previous decision in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Urgent Care Nurses Registry, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:15 am
Levy, 417 U.S. 733 (1974). [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:20 am
Revock v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
Off the top of his head, this Kat recalls these cases: Case C-467/08 Padawan (non-discriminatory 'fair compensation' through private recording levies); Case C‑569/08 Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (abusive .eu domain name registration); Case C‑20/05 Pubblico Ministero v Karl Josef Wilhelm Schwibbert (copyright royalty collection, affixing of marks and technical standards); Case C-376/22 Pie Optiek v Bureau Gevers,… [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:56 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm
Moreover, Judge Kendall decided that the use of Houlihan’s mark to identify it as the subject of the posters’ criticism was protected by Justice Holmes’ opinion in Prestonettes v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:04 am
After listening to the oral arguments in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
The final gift under the relist tree is a handwritten pro se petition, Ben-Levi v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:46 am
The Court primarily noted that Penal Law § 60.35 (1) states that "there shall be levied at sentencing a mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fee, DNA databank fee and a crime victim assistance fee in addition to any sentence required or permitted by law. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 2:14 pm
Mahler v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
Hsue, Lessons from United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:40 pm
Full disclosure: Horvitz & Levy filed a letter in support of the petition for review on behalf of the U.S. [read post]
