Search for: "State v. Louis D." Results 601 - 620 of 828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2010, 11:16 am by Douglas R. Griess
  A Second Circuit case, Tiffany v. eBay and Google v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
So we thought we’d do one of our 50-state updates on what states allow it and which ones don’t.Federal LawIt’s hard to see how market share liability could arise under federal law, but it has. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Live Journal) (Patently-O) (Invent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Article One Partners) (IP Whiteboard) District Court S D Iowa: Delay from stay pending reexam not ‘inherently prejudicial’: Middleton Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Live Journal) (Patently-O) (Invent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Article One Partners) (IP Whiteboard) District Court S D Iowa: Delay from stay pending reexam not ‘inherently prejudicial’: Middleton Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wouldn’t having more players at the table for fair use or legislative reform raise the likelihood that we’d get a decent settlement? [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
(Patent Arcade) District Court C D California: It’s official: Don Henley wins summary judgment over Chuck DeVore on copyright claims (Copyrights & Campaigns) District Court N D California: Louis Vuitton holds ISP accountable for combined $21.6 million: Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v Akanoc Solutions, Inc. et al. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:21 pm by lawmrh
I’d crossed paths with Dottei when I had worked along with others to attempt to establish a state licensing mechanism for Nevada’s private professional guardians. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA's auditor also stated that Miracle Star did not provide adequate records for the audit, which caused the auditor to be unable to determine if Miracle Star had provided all specific services stated in the contract. [read post]
23 May 2010, 11:36 pm
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Plaintiff on liability; defense on damages - Commil v. [read post]