Search for: "State v. M. T." Results 601 - 620 of 16,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
 And, perhaps because of that, I'm hopeful that some state representative (or the Judicial Council) will use this opinion to change the law.But I also recognize that the Legislature is imperfect. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:56 am by Daniel Solove
The only other case I’m aware of where a court has used the constitutional right to information privacy to bar information gathering is another 9th Circuit case — Norman-Bloodsaw v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
And that decision wasn't even especially close, with only two dissenting votes. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
”  The Court stated: “[T]he ‘in navigation’ requirement is an element of the vessel status of a watercraft. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
 Which in turn I'm pretty sure means that the South Carolina judgment isn't entitled to full faith and credit. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:44 pm by Maritime Law Staff
The M/V Buckeye State is one of AEP’s fleet of larger vessels. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This ruling comes on the heels of the District of Columbia Circuit’s holding that state anti-SLAPP laws can’t be invoked in federal court. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]