Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 601 - 620
of 132,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
On May, 18, 2010, the KSC granted several defendants' petitions for review:State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 1:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s February 20, 2019 decision in Timbs v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Yellowhammer Fund v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am
(antitrust) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:59 pm
Our brief focuses on one question presented: May state regulation totally prohibit the free navigation of federally licensed vessels for five months of the year without violating the Supremacy Clause? [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 3:01 pm
” State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:05 pm
CRS Legal Sidebar – Survey of State Marriage Laws, November 22, 2022: “In 2015, the Supreme Court held in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:05 am
The case proceeded to a jury trial on May 19, 2014. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
Ball State University. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
Ball State University. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
The appellant in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Fulmer v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:43 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 9:17 am
State barred from initiating or enacting legislation authorizing the furloughing of State workersDonohue et al v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, 1:10-CV-00543 (LEK/DRH) [Filed May 28,2010]Federal District Court Judge Lawrence E. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:10 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:58 am
The court of appeals held this week in State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 11:03 am
North Dakota (2016), the United States Supreme Court held that state authorities may subject you to criminal penalties for refusing to take a breathalyzer test if you’ve been arrested for driving under the influence (DUI). [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
