Search for: "State v. Mai X." Results 601 - 620 of 3,595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 22 February 2024, Master Dagnall handed down judgment in Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc [2024] EWHC 389 (KB) in relation to an article (“the Article”) first published on 22 May 2021 by Journalism Development Network Inc and written by Mr Daniel Balint-Kurti and Mr William Jordan (“the Defendants”). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The authority relied on by the Government included a Court of Appeal decision (R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWCA Civ 1868 – “the PH case”) and three High Court decisions (R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2194 (Admin) and IT v Secretary of… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:09 pm by David Cosgrove
[x]If you feel you may have fallen victim to such a scam, please contact an attorney for further direction. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
That opens up limited exceptions allowing for abortion, the extent of which was decided by the Supreme Court in the tragic circumstances of Attorney General v X in 1992.X—a teenage girl—had become pregnant as a result of rape and was suicidal. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm by Bennett Cyphers
Some of them may gather data from apps or advertising exchanges directly, but others acquire data exclusively from other data brokers. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 4:58 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
"It appears that the complaint was filed by an investor in the real estate projects - an investor who may not have had any contact with the lawyers.Mansur v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:44 pm by John T. Bradford
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Wolfgang Demino
 LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and PLS Loan Store of Texas,… [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
The Default Situation: The State Can't Punish You For Most Speech Say you want to say "[Politician X]" is an ass." [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:17 am by Larry
Such is the case with United States v. [read post]