Search for: "State v. Mark A. Miller" Results 601 - 620 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
On those bases, the Court rejected application of market-share liability in cases involving vaccines. . . .Moreno, slip op. at 13 (a half-dozen or so Shackil cites and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
Biden will arrive in Belfast to mark the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday peace agreement. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The alleged sum funneled through state party committees in that case was even larger: $112 million. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This marks a return to the consistency of 2018 to 2020, when median settlement value remained $12-13 million. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am by INFORRM
On Monday 28 March 2011, the “Guardian” also reported on the hearing the previous Friday before Mr Justice Vos in the case of Miller v NGN and Mulcaire and the retrieval of the lost email archive. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
 In an op-ed at TC Palm, Mark Miller considers how the topic of stare decisis, or adherence to precedent, may come up during the confirmation, noting that “while stare decisis is a vital legal principle, the justices of the Supreme Court have never considered it a non-negotiable command. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Paul Miller, founding partner at Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, takes issue with tying lobbyists to the Menendez case, which centers on alleged bribery by businesspeople who are not registered lobbyists. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Miller, Patel, and McCarthy have been viewed as crucial witnesses for understanding government’s response to the assault and former President Trump’s reaction to the breach. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by Law Lady
STEWART, P.A., a professional association, MARKS & FLEISCHER, P.A., a professional association, GARY MARKS, AMIR FLEISCHER, LAURA M. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Boyar & Miller, P.C., No. 06-1936, 2007 U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
Justice Samuel Miller, who wrote for the Court, never liked the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:10 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]