Search for: "State v. N. K. B." Results 601 - 620 of 747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While those cases still permeate state and federal courts, large event-driven litigation has become much more common than it was. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am by Kyle Persaud
L. 106–95, §2(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1316] (b) subject to section 1182(j)(2) of this title, who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services (other than services described in subclause (a) during the period in which such subclause applies and other than services described in subclause (ii)(a) or in subparagraph (O) or (P)) in a specialty occupation described in section 1184(i)(1) of this title or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am by admin
A Protectionist Country Blocks Two More Big Deals, Petronas Rejection Casts Doubt on CNOOC $15.1 Billion Bid, Market braces for Petronas fallout, Mulcair Slams Feds on Handling of Petronas Deal, Petronas Deal on Hold Not Dead. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences … [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
 The premise that STECs are not so much pathogens as carriers for a very potent toxin and that therefore they are not so much examples of infectious diseases as they are of a potent colonic toxicosis (which develops later into a toxemia) would be more convincing if evidence were in hand showing that these disease states could be attained without the detectable presence of STEC at all. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
” Id. at 410 (internal quotations omitted); see also id. at 409-11 & n. 44. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate… [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm by Michael Lowe
The term “controlled substance” means “a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in schedule I, II, III, IV, or V of part B of this subchapter. [read post]