Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 601 - 620 of 50,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:17 am by Kirk Anderson
We have received many questions from people wanting to know how the United States Supreme Court decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
  But the Court of Appeal concludes that there's no prejudice therefrom given the state of the overall evidence.Sometimes an attorney should be congratulated for winning at trial. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 11:52 am
Now, in turn, that means it'll probably be even more difficult, if not impossible, for the state to find a place for those convicted of sex offenses to actually live. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi) and Blakely v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by Michael Fox
Under that section, an individual could avoid deportation if the individual:(2)(A) has filed, or is a material witness to, a bona fide workplace claim (as defined in section 274A(e)(10)(B)(iii)(II) of such Act, as added by section 3(b)); and(B) has been helpful, is being helpful, or is likely to be helpful to--(i) a Federal, State, or local law enforcement official;(ii) a Federal, State, or local prosecutor;(iii) a Federal, State, or local judge;(iv) the Department of… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Paul Horwitz
United States an anti-commandeering principle with respect to some otherwise valid Commerce Clause laws that infringe on particular aspects of state sovereignty relating to the political process and structure in those states, so, by virtue of the language referring to the people in the Tenth Amendment, it also prohibits mandates that "commandeer the people. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
But I'm not exactly sure why we want to stop people from letting their spouses come here. [read post]
2 May 2007, 2:31 pm
You can flee the state, use false names, and evade prosecution for 25 years. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:28 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
I wanted to follow-up from my brief post, earlier this week, about Tuesday's motions hearing in Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
This article provides historical context and analysis of the Insular Cases, that series of decisions on the power of the U.S. government over territory and people under the Territorial Clause and criticizes the majority's use of it to justify the "situational" application of constitutional rights to subjects of United States law. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The states passed stay-at-home or shelter-in-place orders to keep people safe. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:38 pm
This is what happened in a recent case of Gordon v. [read post]
Johnson granted a temporary restraining order against state laws designed to take effect after Roe v. [read post]