Search for: "State v. Revels"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
The New York Times has more on the implications that these revelations could play in undermining [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
” The revelation comes after German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s scathing criticism of NSA surveillance of U.S. allies. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:08 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:19 am
Although it is a close call, the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Ohio or Roe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:47 am
In The Author’s Guild v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:22 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:37 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
” When there is no longer respect for human rights, public calls can only state what one hopes for. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
We have had 10 years of total control of the air in Laos and V. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm
In this post, I will begin to explore whether there is a practical way to amend US surveillance law that might satisfy the concerns expressed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Schrems’ concerns originated from revelations that came to public light as part of the Snowden affair in 2013, when EU citizens became aware that US intelligence services, in particular the National Security Agency (‘NSA’) could gain access to the data transferred from the EU to the US without US law and practice limiting such surveillance activity. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
