Search for: "State v. Robert E. Post" Results 601 - 620 of 1,953
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the case, along with a cert petition filed last week that involves a state-court subpoena for the president’s financial records, observing that “[e]ach case presents the Supreme Court with a separation-of-powers quandary—how to adjudicate a dispute between branches of the federal government in Trump v Mazars; and between the president and state prosecutors in Trump v Vance. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, here and here, Mark Walsh at Education Week, Pamela King at E&E News, Shannon Bream and Bill Mears at Fox News, and Joan Biskupic at CNN, who writes that Chief Justice John Roberts “was yet again at the decisive middle of a contentious dispute. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
The hearing will feature testimony from Ellen Lord, the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment; Robert Behler, the director of operational test and evaluation in the office of the secretary of defense; Lt. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
The post Thursday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes and Seung Min Kim report that “[i]f Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Contact: Please answer the call by way of e-mail to the organizers stating the subject “Call for papers”, c/o Prof. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Vol. 94(4) 2019, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 19-37, Kevin E. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” AP reports that “[e]lite universities are urging the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
”  But, she added, “[w]e may as well not have bothered” because the majority decision “sends a flood of complex state-law issues to federal courts. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
”  But, she added, “[w]e may as well not have bothered” because the majority decision “sends a flood of complex state-law issues to federal courts. [read post]